Horrible geeky maths time.
I'll spare the calculations and just give the results.
FRONT
The front driveshaft has a stock length of:
85mm (Hypotenuse)
Angle: (12.0°)
This gives us a triangle:
View attachment 6881
A=17.7mm (distance motor mount needs to move over to centre driveline)
B=83.1mm (new driveshaft length)
C=85.0mm (stock driveshaft length)
Shaft length can decrease by 2mm
REAR
The rear driveshaft has a stock length of:
175mm (Hypotenuse)
Angle: 5.8°
This gives a triangle:
View attachment 6882
A=17.7mm
B=174.1mm
C=175.0mm
Shaft length can decrease by 1mm.
Conclusion:
Total driveshaft lengths (when added together) need to equal as close to 257mm as possible.
Motor mount would then have to move rearwards by as much as 6mm, with corresponding 6mm longer front driveshaft - from 83 to 89mm.
The disadvantage of moving the motor rearwards is less space for longer can motors and more rearward weight bias, but these are comparative minor points compared with power robbing, 12° driveline angles.
In full size vehicles, these angles are not recommended to exceed >2°!!
The planned modifications are not subtle, and whilst I want to endeavour to keep the Kronos XTR's inherent handling characteristics, already I'm seeing reasons where certain trades have to be made for the best quality components.
Principally, weight distribution and kick-up.
These are minor trades to make for lower weight, less rotating mass, greater efficiency and greater stiffness.