Horatio
Well-known member
- Messages
- 888
- Reaction score
- 1,301
I guess getting a reaction - whether it be a positive or negative one - is ultimately good for clicks/views.Yeah I have to agree with everything you've said! They're certainly NOT toys, and I teach that to my 3 and 7 year-olds as I teach them about the hobby. Some times when I'm out driving and a kid comes along and asks me if he can have a go at my 1/8 scale I always say, I'm sorry no, this is not a toy and it could cause serious harm. It's different if I'm with a 1/12 or 1/14 scale, and even then I would limit the throttle to at least 50% before handing over the remote.
I saw about 1/3 of that video and you're right, it was a bit biased and I guess it's just all part of the strategy to get more views. At least he admitted that he's in it purely for the entertainment and the views. But I disagree with what he said that everyone that does YT videos does it to get the most amount of views. That's not always the case, some people do it because they want to share their knowledge and educate others on a given subject.
The ethos of 'whichever toy puts the biggest smile on your face' etc is good. And I get that Kev is yanking the chain on the 'snobbery' element that can lurk within any hobby/sport.
What we don't want to do though is to de-value RC or to put out misleading information that implies to 'responsible adults' that their child's new interest in, say - a 'Raptor 60' - is just a toy. Especially with anything that flies over 250grams now requiring Operator ID, Flyer ID and a Successful >80% result on a test with the CAA.
Now little Jonny is missing 3 fingers, being sued by the neighbours and in trouble with the law! Not to worry - he has a massive, smug smile on his face!
Additionally, I wouldn't like kids going out emulating what they see on YouTube, jumping 9kg Trucks off skate park ramps into a road. Or through a roof! No matter how entertaining it is for me, personally.